NOTE: I had been contemplating writing about Jason Varitek’s place with the Red Sox for some time now, but his controversial All-Star selection sped up the process for me...
Multiyear contracts for 30+ year old catchers have not been kind to teams throughout history. The list of productive catchers, 35 & older, begins and ends with Carlton Fisk--though Jorge Posada is making a valiant effort to join him. In 2004, the Boston Red Sox signed their then-32 year-old catcher, Jason Varitek, to a 4-year $40 million contract two months after winning their first World Series in 86 years. Varitek was named the captain of the team, only the third Red Sox player to receive the honor since 1923.
The decision to sign Varitek was not as automatic as one might think. To that point, the Epstein regime had been especially opposed to signing aging stars to multiyear contracts regardless of their organizational ties—-especially catchers who are known to have shorter shelf-lives than any other position. The idea being that teams should be paying players for future performance rather than past performance. It's the mindset that sent Cliff Floyd, Pedro Martinez, Johnny Damon, and Derek Lowe looking for work elsewhere at various points throughout Epstein's tenure. But with minimal catching options elsewhere, (rumors of a trade for Brian Schneider surfaced for a while), the Sox were willing to give in to Varitek and agent Scott Boras’s demands.
"It's not every day you're lucky enough to sign a player who embodies everything you want your franchise to be," general manager Theo Epstein said. "When you have that player, you don't let him get away."
Varitek responded with an excellent 2005 season, posting a .281/.366/.489 line in 133 games. The contract was justified for one season, at least. However, as Mets and Yankees fans have witnessed with Pedro Martinez and Johnny Damon, the decline period usually doesn’t surface in year one. It is the later years of the deals where they begin to look bad.
Unfortunately for the Red Sox, Varitek’s decline began even sooner than they had hoped. His injury-plagued 2006 season resembled that of a 34 year old catcher, batting .238/.325/.400. To his credit, the Red Sox’ collapse from contention,just as it did in 2001, coincided with Varitek’s knee injury in August. Varitek bounced back slightly in 2007, recording a respectable .255/.367/.421 season, good for a 103 OPS+. The Red Sox won the World Series for the second time, sweeping the Colorado Rockies. Varitek’s performance behind the plate overshadowed anything he did at the plate.
Now, at age 36 and in the final year of his deal, Varitek is having the worst statistical season of his career. Mired in a 14 for 99 (.141) slump, Varitek is posting splits of .220/.300/.360—numbers that fans once expected from Doug Mirabelli. Oddly enough, he was selected by his peers to represent the American League in the All-Star game for the third time—this in spite of his -2.3 value over replacement player (VORP).
VORP measures the number of runs a player contributes beyond what a replacement-level player at the same position would contribute if he were given the same percentage of a team’s plate appearances. In other words, Varitek’s VORP is the number of runs that he improves the Red Sox offense by, by having him in the lineup instead of an easily attainable replacement-level catcher. In other words part 2, by carrying a negative VORP, you can take just about any available catcher, plug him into Varitek’s place in the Red Sox lineup, and they instantly become a better offensive team.
So where is Varitek’s true value? In some cases, it’s in aspects of the game that can’t be quantified. In other cases, you can quantify it, but to an uncertain degree. This is a very tricky game for front-offices to play: how much credence do you put into intangibles?
For example, in 2001 and 2006, the team ERA and opposing OPS rose considerably when Varitek got injured and catchers like Scott Hatteberg, Doug Mirabelli, and Javy Lopez were calling the shots. Is this a representation of game-calling ability or is it luck? As a Red Sox fan, my gut tells me that it is indicative of Varitek’s talents, but objectively it could be coincidental. There's really no way of knowing.
As an outsider, it’s hard to judge how great of a game-caller Varitek is but the reviews from his peers say a lot. (EDIT: Yes, these are the same peers who were responsible for some outlandish All-Star selections--Varitek included--so maybe their opinions should be taken lightly) Varitek has caught great pitchers like Pedro Martinez, Curt Schilling, and Josh Beckett, who have each raved about Varitek’s preparation and mental fortitude in holding down the pitching staff. Veterans like Hideo Nomo, Bret Saberhagen, Pat Rapp, and David Cone, who bounced around at the end of their careers, each experienced solid post-prime seasons with Varitek at the helm. Young starters for Boston have also found success while working with Varitek. Recently, compare the early results of Jon Lester, Clay Buchholz, and Justin Masterson in a hitter’s ballpark to those of Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy, two prospects who were generally regarded more highly than Boston's. Would the results be different if the catchers were swapped? I think it's fair to believe that.
One intangible that I don’t buy into, is that his presence has an effect on team chemistry. Unlike basketball and football, where teamwork is so prevelant that chemistry issues constantly surface, baseball is an individual sport masquerading as a team sport. You don’t win baseball games because you have good chemistry. You appear to have good chemistry because you are winning games. The baseball media always perpetuates erroneous beliefs regarding causation and correlation. It’s similar to the fallacy you always hear about Jose Reyes and the New York Mets. “The Mets are a winning team when Jose Reyes is having fun and smiling.” No, that’s not true at all. Jose Reyes is having fun and smiling because the Mets are winning—not the other way around.
So are Varitek’s intangibles overrated? Could another catcher step in and handle the staff as well as he has? Possibly, but without being able to know for sure, and without there being a plethora of alternatives, is replacing Varitek at the end of the season a risk worth taking? I don’t think that it is. Russell Martins and Joe Mauers don’t grow on trees, so there aren't many significant improvements out there. I’d feel much more comfortable with Varitek and his relationship with the staff behind the plate than I would feel if the Sox were to hand the reins over to some unknown commodity in search of 40 points of OPS.
However, the Red Sox can not allow Varitek and his captaincy to become an albatross for the team offensively. If the Red Sox are to resign him—and as long as there aren’t any maniacal offers to match, I think they should (2 years is about where I’d max out...the $ value means little to me since the Red Sox have the money)—they can no longer treat him as an above average offensive player. They must recognize that he is now your ordinary defensive-oriented catcher with some occasional pop.
He should bat 8th or 9th at all times and he should rarely get a 4th at-bat in a game that the Red Sox are trailing. His bat speed is far too slow to catch up with late-inning fireballers. Pinch-hit for him, pinch-run for him, and give him extra days off during the season, along with the mandatory Wakefield rest. If it’s agreed that Varitek’s importance behind the plate is where his true value comes from, then he should not be insulted if and when Francona sends up a better hitter (Sean Casey, Brandon Moss, Alex Cora) in a big spot. Better yet, as the captain, he should be fully supportive, seeing as each of the aforementioned moves would be in the team’s best interest.
